2 Comments

“ Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government…”

If by security is meant to be secure within our own borders, then it is a failed state, for the very government that supposedly secures us, actually poses a threat, be it the police forces or foreign wars. We live under a warrior regime, regardless of the political party in ascendance; the business of the government is protection of the corporations that pollute every environment, and the promotion of war(s).

Where then is this vaunted security?

Expand full comment

Thanks for your reply, my friend, and apologies for the tardy reply (I've been a bit "under the weather." I think I understand your criticism very well and that it stems from a semantic difference in use of the word "security." Paine was not, after all, encumbered with the negative statist inflections of the term that we use today ie. the security state. When we read a text from history, sometimes it can be tricky to leave aside our own vocabulary and search for the meaning of the writer. Paine meant PRECISELY safety and security FROM overweaning and oppressive government ... and specifically from war-mongers. He meant the only kind of authentic security - safety, equality, justice, and freedom from want. I believe that is the sense in which he used the word "security." Thanks again for commenting.

Expand full comment